2
25 Feb 12 at 11 am

Asked by danikamcclure

asker 1. I mean, most women never know they're pregnant, and 60% of the zygote cells never attach themselves to the uterus and it goes out when you have your period, you can conceive without knowing it ever happened. 4. I think that would be great too, but I also don't think that women should be forced to have a child they don't want. I think they should have the choice. 5. It is far, but that is implied by the bill. I'm not saying abortion is the save all or that everyone should do it.

1. the zygote not attaching is another form of a miscarriage - all things considered. just because something doesn’t have capacities (the means to make choices, knowledge of surroundings, preferences, etc) doesn’t make its human sanctity any less viable. otherwise those that are handicapped and/or senile (elderly) would fit the category of people you find fit to be lost.
4. parents that can’t handle having a downs syndrome child:
given to adoption
kids who can’t handle taking care of their elderly parents:
nursing homes
women who simply don’t want to give birth? a pregnancy is just another hardship. but adoption would be the answer to the aftermath. people who dont want to pay bills, take care of their children, etc are forced to, so why not give birth to them so they can have leave of the responsibility? i.e adoption afterward.

i know i’m getting way too riled up, but here i go; posting it anyway.

  1. gingerkicker said: i don’t like getting involved in this stuff…. but i don’t feel like it should be the mother’s choice whether or not to kill the life inside of her.
  2. eightysixthousandfourhundred posted this